Metro vs. Non-Metro Business Patterns: Urban-Rural Business Differences (2022)

What if you could see that California has 1.02 million establishments and 16.0 million employees—primarily in metro areas—while Wyoming has just 23,196 establishments and 208,000 employees—primarily in non-metro areas? This Metro vs. Non-Metro Business Patterns analysis reveals exactly how urban and rural business patterns differ—and how you can position yourself in the location type that matches your business model.

The data shows dramatic differences: states with large metro areas (like California with 1.02 million establishments) have very different business patterns than states with primarily non-metro areas (like Wyoming with 23,196 establishments). This isn’t just about geography—it’s about understanding urban-rural business differences, location type patterns, and market opportunities that directly impact your location strategy.

Note: Full metro vs. non-metro comparisons require metropolitan statistical area (MSA) data. This analysis uses state-level data to show general patterns, noting that states with large urban populations will have different patterns than more rural states.

Compare business patterns between metro and non-metro areas to understand location differences. This analysis rev

This analysis examines County Business Patterns (CBP) data from the U.S. Census Bureau to compare business patterns between metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas, revealing urban-rural business differences. You’ll discover how metro and non-metro areas differ in establishment counts, employment, business density, and industry distribution—and where opportunities exist for businesses in each location type.

What You’ll Discover:

• State-level patterns indicating metro vs. non-metro business differences
• Urban-rural business pattern comparisons revealing location type differences
• Location-specific business indicators impacting metro vs. non-metro decisions
• Business pattern analysis by location type (urban vs. rural)
• Location type indicators for strategic business decisions

Why This Matters: Understanding metro vs. non-metro business patterns helps you identify which location type matches your business model, assess market structure differences, and make strategic location decisions. Metro and non-metro areas offer different market structures, customer bases, and competitive dynamics.

Note: Full metro vs. non-metro comparisons require metropolitan statistical area (MSA) data. This analysis uses state-level data to show general patterns, noting that states with large urban populations (like California, Texas, New York) will have different patterns than more rural states (like Wyoming, Vermont).

Business Patterns Vary Dramatically by Location Type

The Numbers: States with large metro areas (California: 1.02M establishments) have 44x more establishments than primarily non-metro states (Wyoming: 23,196 establishments). This means metro areas typically have much higher business density than non-metro areas.

So What? Metro and non-metro areas have very different business patterns. Metro areas offer larger markets, more competition, and higher business density, while non-metro areas offer smaller markets, less competition, and lower business density. Understanding these patterns helps you choose the location type that matches your business model.

How to Use This: If you need large customer bases and can handle competition, metro areas may be better. If you need lower costs and less competition, non-metro areas may be better. Always consider your business model when choosing location type.

Metro Areas Typically Have Higher Business Density

The Numbers: States with large metro areas like California (1.02M establishments, 16.0M employees) and Texas (657K establishments, 11.5M employees) have much higher business density than primarily non-metro states like Wyoming (23K establishments, 208K employees).

So What? Metro areas typically have more establishments and employment per square mile, creating different competitive dynamics. Higher density means more competition but also larger markets and more opportunity. Lower density means less competition but also smaller markets.

How to Use This: Target metro areas for larger markets and more opportunity, but expect more competition. Target non-metro areas for less competition and lower costs, but expect smaller markets. Choose based on your business model and competitive strategy.

Location Type Strategy Must Account for Business Patterns

The Numbers: The difference between large metro states (California, 1.02M establishments) and primarily non-metro states (Wyoming, 23K establishments) is 44x, meaning dramatically different business patterns and market structures.

So What? Location type directly impacts your market structure, competitive dynamics, and business opportunities. Metro areas offer different advantages (market size, diversity) than non-metro areas (lower costs, less competition). Your location choice should align with your business model.

How to Use This: For businesses requiring large markets, target metro areas. For businesses requiring lower costs, target non-metro areas. Always validate location type choice with market research and business model alignment.

Red Flags

• Metro Location with Small Market Needs: Metro areas may have higher costs and more competition than needed for small-market businesses
• Non-Metro Location with Large Market Needs: Non-metro areas may have smaller markets than needed for large-market businesses
• Location Type-Business Model Mismatch: Choosing location type that doesn’t match your business model may create competitive disadvantages

Green Lights

• Metro Location for Large Markets: Metro areas offer larger markets, more diversity, and greater opportunity for businesses requiring large customer bases
• Non-Metro Location for Cost Efficiency: Non-metro areas offer lower costs, less competition, and cost advantages for businesses requiring efficiency
• Location Type-Business Model Alignment: Choosing location type that matches your business model (metro for large markets, non-metro for efficiency) offers competitive advantages
• Hybrid Approach: Some businesses may benefit from metro presence with non-metro operations, balancing market access with cost efficiency

How to Use This Data

Follow this step-by-step process to identify metro vs. non-metro patterns and make data-driven location type decisions:

Step 1: Assess Your Business Model Requirements

Determine what your business needs from a location:

• Market Size: Do you need large customer bases (metro) or can you serve smaller markets (non-metro)?
• Competition Level: Can you handle high competition (metro) or do you need less competition (non-metro)?
• Cost Structure: Can you afford higher costs (metro) or do you need lower costs (non-metro)?
• Industry Type: Does your industry require metro presence (e.g., tech, finance) or work well in non-metro (e.g., agriculture, tourism)?

Action: Create a checklist of your business model requirements. Identify whether you need metro or non-metro characteristics.

Step 2: Compare Metro vs. Non-Metro Patterns

Use CBP data to compare business patterns:

• State-Level Patterns: States with large metro areas (500K+ establishments) vs. primarily non-metro states (<100K establishments)
• Business Density: Metro areas typically have higher density (establishments per square mile) than non-metro areas
• Market Size: Metro areas typically have larger markets (more establishments, employment) than non-metro areas

Action: For each candidate location type, compare business patterns using CBP data. Identify which location type matches your business model requirements.

Step 3: Evaluate Location Type Fit

Assess how well each location type fits your business:

• Metro Fit: Metro areas offer larger markets, more diversity, and greater opportunity but also more competition and higher costs
• Non-Metro Fit: Non-metro areas offer lower costs, less competition, and cost advantages but also smaller markets and less diversity

Action: For each location type, evaluate fit with your business model. Score each on: market size (30%), competition level (30%), costs (20%), and industry fit (20%).

Step 4: Choose Your Location Type

Select metro or non-metro based on your business model and market needs.

Action: Create a decision matrix scoring metro vs. non-metro on: business model fit (40%), market size (30%), and costs (30%). Choose the location type with highest score.

Step 5: Validate with MSA Data (If Available)

For precise metro vs. non-metro comparisons, use MSA-level CBP data when available.

Action: If MSA data is available, compare metro and non-metro areas within your target state to validate location type choice.

Common Use Cases

Scenario 1: Large Market Business → Focus on metro areas with large establishment counts (500K+). These areas offer larger markets, more diversity, and greater opportunity.

Scenario 2: Cost-Efficient Business → Target non-metro areas with lower establishment counts (<100K). These areas offer lower costs, less competition, and cost advantages.

Scenario 3: Balanced Approach → Consider states with moderate metro presence (200K-500K establishments) that offer balanced urban-rural mix with moderate markets and costs.

Scenario 4: Industry-Specific Strategy → Choose location type based on industry requirements. Tech and finance may require metro areas, while agriculture and tourism may work well in non-metro areas.

Questions to Ask Yourself

• Does my business model require large markets (metro) or can I serve smaller markets (non-metro)?
• Can I handle high competition (metro) or do I need less competition (non-metro)?
• What costs can I afford—higher metro costs or lower non-metro costs?
• Does my industry require metro presence or work well in non-metro areas?

Action Items Checklist

• Assess your business model requirements (market size, competition, costs, industry)
• Compare metro vs. non-metro patterns using CBP state-level data
• Evaluate location type fit with your business model
• Score metro vs. non-metro on business model fit, market size, and costs
• Choose location type (metro or non-metro) based on highest score
• Validate with MSA-level data if available for precise comparisons
• Consult with Business Initiative for metro vs. non-metro analysis and location strategy guidance

Industry-Specific Recommendations

Technology Services (NAICS 51): Target metro areas with large establishment counts (500K+). Technology businesses benefit from metro areas with large markets, diverse talent, and tech ecosystems.

Professional Services (NAICS 54): Focus on metro areas with moderate-to-large establishment counts (200K-500K+). Professional services benefit from metro areas with business activity and client access.

Retail Trade (NAICS 44-45): Look for metro areas with large establishment counts (500K+) for customer base, or non-metro areas (<100K) for niche markets. Retail needs customers, so choose based on market size needs.

Agriculture (NAICS 11): Prioritize non-metro areas with lower establishment counts. Agriculture businesses typically work well in non-metro areas with land access and lower costs.

Tourism/Hospitality (NAICS 72): Consider both metro and non-metro based on tourism patterns. Some tourism businesses benefit from metro areas (urban tourism), while others benefit from non-metro areas (rural tourism).

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Mistake 1: Using Only State-Level Data Without MSA Data State-level data shows general patterns but doesn’t reveal precise metro vs. non-metro differences within states. Always use MSA-level data when available for precise comparisons.

Mistake 2: Ignoring Business Model Requirements Choosing location type without considering business model requirements may create mismatches. Always align location type with your business model (metro for large markets, non-metro for efficiency).

Mistake 3: Not Considering Industry-Specific Patterns Overall patterns don’t reflect your industry’s specific requirements. Some industries require metro presence (tech, finance), while others work well in non-metro areas (agriculture, tourism).

Mistake 4: Overlooking Cost Differences Metro areas typically have higher costs than non-metro areas. Don’t ignore cost differences—they impact profitability and business viability.

Mistake 5: Not Validating with Market Research CBP data shows patterns but doesn’t reveal local market dynamics, customer preferences, or competitive positioning. Always validate with market research and local analysis.

Optimization Strategies

For Maximum Market Access: Target metro areas with large establishment counts (500K+) that offer larger markets, more diversity, and greater opportunity. These areas reward businesses that can leverage market size and diversity.

For Cost Efficiency: Focus on non-metro areas with lower establishment counts (<100K) that offer lower costs, less competition, and cost advantages. These areas reward businesses that prioritize efficiency.

For Balanced Approach: Consider states with moderate metro presence (200K-500K establishments) that offer balanced urban-rural mix with moderate markets and costs.

For Industry-Specific Strategy: Choose location type based on industry requirements. Tech and finance may require metro areas, while agriculture and tourism may work well in non-metro areas.

Timing Considerations

Best Time to Enter Metro Markets: When you have resources ready and competitive positioning complete. Metro markets reward businesses that can leverage market size and diversity.

Best Time to Enter Non-Metro Markets: When you have cost-efficient operations and can serve smaller markets. Non-metro markets reward businesses that prioritize efficiency.

When to Reassess: Review location type choice annually when new CBP releases become available. Market positions change, and what was optimal 2-3 years ago may not be today.

Resource Recommendations

For Metro vs. Non-Metro Analysis:

• Census Bureau County Business Patterns (official CBP data source)
• Census Bureau Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) definitions and data
• State economic development websites (local market insights)
• MSA-level CBP data for precise metro vs. non-metro comparisons

For Location Support:

• Business Initiative location strategy services
• Local chamber of commerce (metro vs. non-metro market information)
• State Secretary of State websites (business registration requirements)

For Market Research:

• Combine CBP establishment and employment data to assess metro vs. non-metro patterns
• Research local market dynamics and customer preferences in metro vs. non-metro areas
• Consult with Business Initiative for personalized metro vs. non-metro analysis and location guidance

FAQs - Frequently Asked Questions About Metro vs. Non-Metro Business Patterns:

In Summary

Our comprehensive exploration of metro vs. non-metro business patterns (2022) has revealed critical insights into urban-rural business differences, location type patterns, and market opportunities that can inform strategic business decisions.

Key Findings:

• Business patterns vary dramatically by location type—states with large metro areas (California: 1.02M establishments) have 44x more establishments than primarily non-metro states (Wyoming: 23K establishments)
• Metro areas typically have higher business density—metro areas generally have more establishments and employment per square mile, creating different competitive dynamics than non-metro areas
• Location type strategy must account for business patterns—choosing metro vs. non-metro locations provides access to different market structures, customer bases, and competitive dynamics
• Metro areas offer larger markets but more competition—metro areas typically have larger markets, more diversity, and greater opportunity but also more competition and higher costs
• Non-metro areas offer lower costs but smaller markets—non-metro areas typically have lower costs, less competition, and cost advantages but also smaller markets and less diversity

What This Means for Your Business: Understanding metro vs. non-metro business patterns helps you identify which location type matches your business model, assess market structure differences, and make strategic location decisions. Metro areas offer different advantages (market size, diversity) than non-metro areas (lower costs, less competition). The best approach aligns location type with your business model requirements.

Practical Applications:

• Location Strategy: Use metro vs. non-metro pattern data to identify location types that match your business model (metro for large markets, non-metro for efficiency)
• Market Analysis: Compare business patterns between metro and non-metro areas to understand market structure differences and competitive dynamics
• Competitive Positioning: Choose location type based on your competitive strategy (metro for market access, non-metro for cost efficiency)
• Strategic Planning: Align location type choice with business model requirements, market needs, and competitive strategy

Next Steps:

1. Assess your business model requirements (market size, competition, costs, industry)
2. Compare metro vs. non-metro patterns using CBP state-level data
3. Evaluate location type fit with your business model
4. Choose location type (metro or non-metro) based on business model alignment
5. Consult with Business Initiative for metro vs. non-metro analysis and location strategy guidance

Applying the insights from this article can have several practical benefits:

• Strategic Planning: Use this data to inform market analysis and competitive positioning.
• Competitive Analysis: Compare your market position against industry benchmarks.
• Risk Assessment: Understand market size and business density to assess opportunities.

By leveraging the information outlined in this article, businesses can gain a competitive edge and make more informed strategic decisions.

Ready to take action based on this data?

This data can help you make informed decisions about business location, market entry, and strategic planning.

Business Initiative offers expert services to help you leverage this information:

• Explore Profit Margin
• Explore Break Even Analysis
• Explore Break Even

For personalized advice, schedule a consultation with Business Initiative or reach out through our contact form.

Explore more by subscribing to The Initiative Newsletter or following us on X for the latest insights.

Tweet to @BisInitiative